
March Volatility: Implications for Fixed Income Investors
What Happened?
March kicked off with Treasury yields slipping modestly below their recent trading range, while the S&P 500 dipped below its 200-day moving average for the first time since 2023. Although the immediate trigger for this bump in volatility was the announcement of initial tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China, early signs of a Treasury rally were already underway—driven by persistent softness in survey-based economic data we have discussed in prior months.
While U.S. markets were focused on trade tensions and their potential drag on growth, an entirely different story unfolded in Europe. German bond yields surged as markets reacted sharply to plans for a large-scale fiscal expansion. In just three trading days, Germany’s 10-year Bond yield jumped from 2.4% to nearly 3.0%, shaking up euro-denominated fixed income markets.
Following that dramatic first week, markets largely returned to a range bound pattern as the economic calendar offered few surprises. Inflation remained sticky, with core PCE rising 0.3% month-over-month and 2.8% year-over-year. The labor market also remained firm:
- Unemployment Rate: 4.1%
- Non-Farm Payrolls: +151k
- Initial Jobless Claims: Averaged ~220k throughout the month
As expected, the March 19 FOMC meeting delivered no change to the Fed Funds target rate, which remained at 4.25%–4.50%. However, investors looked to the Fed’s Summary of Economic Projections for guidance. The Fed revised its 2025 GDP outlook down from 2.1% to 1.7%, while increasing both its core inflation forecast (2.8% from 2.5%) and unemployment rate projection (4.4% from 4.3%). Curiously, despite these changes, the year-end Fed Funds rate forecast remained at 3.9%, adding to the market’s confusion.
Reference yield changes for the month:
- 5-year Treasury: 4.02% → 3.95%
- 5-year AAA muni: 2.63% → 2.93% (Taxable Equivalent Yield ~4.95%)
- 10-year Treasury: 4.21% → 4.21%
- 10-year AAA muni: 2.86% → 3.30% (Taxable Equivalent Yield ~5.57%)
Tax-exempt yields moved higher across the curve, primarily due to a combination of seasonal tax-bill payment selling, a pickup in new supply, and speculation around future tax policy changes. Meanwhile, taxable investment-grade bonds outperformed, with performance closely tied to specific underlying credit quality. Investors should consult their own tax advisor regarding their individual tax situation.

All yield figures represent gross market yields and do not reflect the impact of fees or expenses.
What Are We Thinking?
The wild swings seen in the final two days of March across fixed income, equities, and gold were just the early signs of more volatility ahead. Tariffs tend to act as external shocks to the economy that force repricing across asset classes. The immediate reaction was a typical flight-to-safety rally benefiting high quality fixed income. However, the longer-term market response and different asset class repricing’s—driven by potential trade negotiations, inflation, labor dynamics, and economic spillovers—will unfold over time.
Our taxable team’s view remains that—even when used as negotiating tools—tariffs and counter-tariffs are ultimately negative for both U.S. and global growth. The textbook view that tariffs are a one-time increase in price levels oversimplifies the reality. As we have seen, this is a prolonged process, often drawn out through months of negotiations and tit-for-tat escalations. Importantly, market consensus has pared down U.S. growth expectations. At the start of the year, the Street was looking for U.S. 2025 GDP growth around 2.5%; now it's closer to 1.5%. At this time, the Fed is on an indefinite holding pattern unless the labor market weakens noticeably.
Looking ahead, while we expect continued swings in both inflation and interest rates, we believe tax-exempt fixed income remains just as well positioned as taxables—particularly as the extension of the 2017 tax cuts works its way through Congress. Under a current policy baseline (vs. current law) scoring framework, extending the 2017 tax cuts would be treated more deficit-neutral, requiring fewer fiscal offsets. Additionally, any future insurance rate cuts by the Federal Reserve would create more tailwinds for taxable and tax exempt portfolios alike.
Bottom Line
Taken together, recent volatility, trade policy friction, and shifting expectations for growth may create a more supportive environment for high-quality fixed income. In particular, we see value in both taxable and tax-exempt fixed income, as we believe these strategies serve as effective diversifiers to equities in uncertain times.
This piece is intended for informational purposes only. All information provided is subject to change. Investing in securities is speculative and entails risk. There can be no assurance that the investment objectives will be achieved or that an investment strategy will be successful Securities are offered through Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., a registered broker-dealer and affiliate of OAM. This material is not a recommendation as defined in Regulation Best Interest adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. It is provided to you after you have received Form CRS, Regulation Best Interest disclosure and other materials. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The risks associated with investing in fixed income include risks related to interest rate movements as the price of these securities will decrease as interests rates rise (interest rate risk and reinvestment risk), the risk of credit quality deterioration which is an issuer that will not be able to make principal and interest payments on time (credit or default risk), and liquidity risk (the risk of not being able to buy or sell investments quickly for a price that is close to the true underlying value of the asset). Average credit quality is calculated by considering the proportion of the value of each individual credit rating) lower of Moodys or S&P) and noting it as a percentage of the entire portfolio, thus producing the average credit quality. Adverse changes in economic conditions or developments regarding the issuer are more likely to cause price volatility for issuers of high yield debt than would be the case for issuers of higher grade debt securities. A credit rating is an assessment provided by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) such as Standard & Poor or Moody's of the creditworthiness of the issuer with respect to debt obligations. Ratings are measured on a scale that generally ranges from AAA/AAA (highest, depending on the rating organization) to C or D (lowest, again, depending upon the rating organization). Quality Distribution is based on a weighted average of strategy accounts. Bond ratings are categorized by the lower of Moody's or S&P. For more information regarding bond ratings on municipal bonds, please visit www.moodys.com/ratings or www.spglobal.com/ratings.
* (Taxable Equivalent Yield = YTW adjusted for top Federal tax bracket + 3.8% surcharge for appropriate Munis). The views expressed herein are those of the authors as of the date indicated and may change without notice. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. or its affiliates and should not be construed as a firm recommendation or investment advice.
Any forward-looking statements are based on current assumptions, expectations, and market conditions, which are subject to change.
There is no guarantee that any projections or views will be realized.
OAM and Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. are both indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. Securities are offered by Oppenheimer & Co. Inc 7745355.3